You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Swingler > Job Swingler (1777 - 1863)

Desborough People
Job Swingler

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   5423 1.0 Job Swinglermale

Birth: about 1777, at Lubenham, LeicestershireCensus
Death: 28 Feb 1863, at Braybrooke, NorthamptonshireProbate
Probate: 28 Mar 1863  executors, etc

Pedigree
   5424
Married: Rose [not known]  before 1815Est. from child
b. before 1797

   54252.1 Elizabeth Swinglerfemale
Birth: 08 Jan 1815, at Braybrooke, NorthamptonshireWesleyan Reg
Baptism: 05 Mar 1816 at Wesleyan Chapel, DesboroughWesleyan Reg

   54302.2 Thomas Swinglermale
Birth: 11 Jul 1817, at Braybrooke, NorthamptonshireWesleyan Reg
Baptism: 18 Aug 1817 at Wesleyan Chapel, DesboroughWesleyan Reg

   54312.3 William Swinglermale
Birth: 06 Nov 1818, at Braybrooke, NorthamptonshireWesleyan Reg
Baptism: 21 Dec 1818 at Wesleyan Chapel, DesboroughWesleyan Reg

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page