You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Ginns > Samuel Ginns (1843 - 1894)

Desborough People
Samuel Ginns


Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:


   546 1.0 Samuel Ginnsmale
543 Father: Thomas Ginns    bap. 19 Sep 1816 at Desborough    d. 08 Jan 1881 at Desborough
544 Mother: Ann Turner    b. about 1820 at Desborough
Birth: about 1843, at DesboroughCensus
Death: 03 Nov 1894 , at Desborough, age: 51yMercury

Married: (1) Mary [not known]  before 1867Est. from child
b. about 1845, at Harlaxton, LeicestershireCensus

   45042.1 Joseph Henry Ginnsmale
Birth: about 1867, at DesboroughCensus

   45052.2 Albin Ginnsmale
Birth: about 1870, at DesboroughCensus
Married: Naomi Freeman  1895BMD
b. about 1873, at Sutton Bassett, NorthamptonshireCensus

   45062.3 Robert Ginnsmale
Birth: about 1878, at DesboroughCensus

Married: (2) Isabella Flude nee Wilks  about 1883BMD
bap. 17 Jun 1838 at St Clement Danes, Westminster, LondonIGI



The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.

Source Codes

top of page