You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Ginns > Lester Ginns (1803 - 1880)

Desborough People
Lester Ginns


Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:


   582 1.0 Lester Ginnsmale
586 Father: Lister Ginns    b. before 1761 at Desborough
587 Mother: Hannah Woodcock    b. about 1762 at Desborough    bur. 30 May 1829 at St Giles, Desborough
Baptism: 14 Aug 1803 at Desborough (source reads 'Lister son of Lister and Hannah Ginns') Bp Transcripts Desb
Death: about 1880BMD

Married: Sarah Page  at Desborough 19 Oct 1826IGI
b. about 1808, at DesboroughCensus

   5852.1 Hannah Ginnsfemale
Baptism: 20 Feb 1831 at DesboroughIGI

   5842.2 Lucy Ginnsfemale
Baptism: 27 Oct 1833 at DesboroughIGI
Death: 10 Nov 1897 , at Desborough, age: 63yMercury

Additional Information: BMD Announcements

Additional information:
Married: James Panter  about 1877BMD
bap. 13 Apr 1817 at DesboroughIGI

   55152.3 Robert Ginnsmale
Father's name given as Leicester Jinns
Birth: 23 Mar 1837, at DesboroughWesleyan Reg
Baptism: 25 Jun 1837 at Wesleyan Chapel, DesboroughWesleyan Reg



The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.

Source Codes

top of page