You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Looker > William Robert Looker (1868 - 1903)

Desborough People
William Robert Looker

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   5837 1.0 William Robert Lookermale

Birth: about 1868, at Broome, SuffolkCensus
Death: about 1903, age: 34yBMD

Pedigree
   2796
Married: Elizabeth Maria Marlow  1889BMD
b. about 1870, at Desborough

   58382.1 Susan C Lookerfemale
Birth: about Feb 1891, at DesboroughCensus

   176742.2 Irving Robert Lookermale
Birth: about Mar 1895, at DesboroughMercury
Death: 06 Sep 1895, at Desborough, age: 6m. Mercury

Additional Information: BMD Announcements

   94732.3 Mabel Lookerfemale
Birth: about 1896, at DesboroughCensus

   171542.4 Edith May Lookerfemale
Baptism: 24 Feb 1899 at DesboroughIGI

   171552.5 Elsie Lookerfemale
Baptism: 28 Aug 1899 at DesboroughIGI

   94742.6 William Lookermale
Birth: about 1900, at DesboroughCensus

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page