You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Thompson > Cecilia Pauline Eastclose Thompson (1874 - )

Desborough People
Cecilia Pauline Eastclose Thompson


Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:


   5889 1.0 Cecilia Pauline Eastclose Thompsonfemale
5886 Father: William Thompson   b. 1831 at Pitsford, Northamptonshire   d. 23 Oct 1884
5887 Mother: Louise Pauline Janetta Dutriut   b. about 1837 at Lausanne, Switzerland
Birth: about 1874, at Hinton, HampshireCensus

Married: Charles Goodman  about 1896BMD
b. about 1875, at Braybrooke, Northamptonshire

   92082.1 Florence May Goodmanfemale
Birth: about 1896, at DesboroughCensus
Baptism: 24 May 1896 at DesboroughIGI

   92092.2 Alice Louise Goodmanfemale
Birth: about 1898, at DesboroughCensus
Baptism: 21 Apr 1898 at DesboroughIGI

   170442.3 Frederick Henry Goodmanmale
Baptism: 25 Jan 1902 at DesboroughIGI

   170452.4 Maud Amelie Goodmanfemale
Baptism: 28 Dec 1904 at DesboroughIGI



The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.

Source Codes

top of page