Desborough People
Mary Ann Coe
Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:
5994
1.0 Mary Ann Coefemale
BMD shows maiden name of Joseph's wife as Cox, but Mary Ann Coe seems to be the only match for age, forename and birthplace
1348
Father:
Thomas Coe
b. 1824 at Desborough
d. 28 May 1886
2201
Mother:
Mary Brown
b. 1823 at Gumley, Leicestershire
d. 24 May 1918
Birth: about 1853, at Desborough
CensusPedigree
1633Married:
Joseph Miller
1873
BMD
b. about 1853, at DesboroughCensus
Birth: about 1875, at DesboroughCensus
Birth: about 1877, at DesboroughCensus
Birth: about 1877, at DesboroughCensus
Birth: about 1877, at DesboroughCensus
Birth: about 1879, at DesboroughCensus
Birth: about 1882, at DesboroughCensus
Birth: about 1884, at DesboroughCensus
Birth: about 1885, at DesboroughCensus
Birth: about 1887, at DesboroughCensus
Birth: about 1893, at Rothwell, NorthamptonshireCensus
Birth: about 1895, at Rothwell, NorthamptonshireCensus
Notes
The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.
The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown
when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.
Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier;
if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.
Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.
Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51"
show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650),
and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating"
are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.
Source Codes
top of page