You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Bollard > William Bollard (1861 - )

Desborough People
William Bollard

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   6019 1.0 William Bollardmale
16559 Father: Samuel Bollard    b. about 1828 at Little Harrowden, Northamptonshire
16560 Mother: Bridget Newton    b. about 1829 at Stoke Doyle, Northamptonshire
Birth: about 1861, at Little Harrowden, NorthamptonshireCensus

Pedigree
   6020
Married: Emma Litchfield  1883BMD
b. about 1856, at Southill, BedfordshireCensus

   60212.1 Eva E Bollardfemale
Birth: about 1884, at DesboroughCensus

   60222.2 Mabel Bollardfemale
Birth: about 1886, at DesboroughCensus

   60232.3 Fred Bollardmale
Birth: about 1888, at DesboroughCensus

   177182.4 William Edward Bollardmale
Birth: 1890BMD
Death: Feb 1891 , at Desborough, age: 4mMercury

Additional Information: BMD Announcements

   165612.5 John A Bollardmale
Birth: about 1892, at DesboroughCensus

   165622.6 Dorothy Bollardfemale
Birth: about 1895, at Leicester, LeicestershireCensus

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page