You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Kendall > Selina Maria Kendall (1862 - )

Desborough People
Selina Maria Kendall


Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:


   6201 1.0 Selina Maria Kendallfemale
6199 Father: Francis Burdett Kendall   b. about 1811 at Great Oxendon, Northamptonshire   d. 1886
6200 Mother: Sarah Ann Phillips   b. about 1835 at Braybrooke, Northamptonshire
Birth: 1862, at OxendonCensus

Married: James Pain  about 1883BMD
b. about 1850, at Great Oakley, Northamptonshire

   77892.1 Grace Painfemale
Birth: about 1885, at DesboroughCensus

   77882.2 George Tebbot Painmale
Birth: about May 1886, at DesboroughMI
Death: 11 Nov 1886, age: 6m. MI  memorial
Burial: at St Giles, DesboroughMI

   77902.3 Gordon Painmale
Birth: about 1887, at DesboroughCensus

   77912.4 Douglas Painmale
Birth: about 1889, at Corby, NorthamptonshireCensus

   77922.5 Lance Painmale
Birth: about 1894, at Corby, NorthamptonshireCensus



The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.

Source Codes

top of page