You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Bailey > Robert Bailey (1838 - 1921)

Desborough People
Robert Bailey


Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:


   7367 1.0 Robert Baileymale

Birth: about 1838, at Kettering, NorthamptonshireCensus
Death: 1921, age: 83yBMD

Married: Sybel Nursey  1860BMD
b. about 1842, at DesboroughCensus

   160922.1 Walter Baileymale
Birth: about 1862, at Kettering, NorthamptonshireCensus

   160932.2 Rose Baileyfemale
Birth: about 1863, at Kettering, NorthamptonshireCensus

   160992.3 Fred Baileymale
Birth: about Mar 1871, at Kettering, NorthamptonshireCensus

   160942.4 Ada Kate Bailey   also known as Kate Baileyfemale
Birth: about 1873, at Kettering, NorthamptonshireCensus

   160952.5 Alfred Baileymale
Birth: about 1876, at Kettering, NorthamptonshireCensus

   160962.6 Stephen Baileymale
Birth: about 1877, at Kettering, NorthamptonshireCensus

   160972.7 Gertrude Baileyfemale
Birth: about Mar 1881, at Kettering, NorthamptonshireCensus

   160982.8 Bert Baileymale
Birth: about 1885, at Kettering, NorthamptonshireCensus



The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.

Source Codes

top of page