You are here: Desborough > Surnames > [not known] > Eliza [not known] (1829 - 1908)

Desborough People
Eliza [not known]


Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:


   7499 1.0 Eliza [not known]female

Birth: about 1829, at Harborough, LeicestershireCensus
Death: about 1908, age: 80yBMD

Married: Charles Coe  before 1859Est. from child
bap. 01 Jan 1832 at DesboroughIGI

   75002.1 Elizabeth Coefemale
Birth: about 1859, at DesboroughCensus
Baptism: 11 Dec 1859 at Market Harborough, LeicestershireIGI

   75012.2 Hannah Coefemale
Birth: about 1860, at Market Harborough, LeicestershireCensus
Baptism: 08 Apr 1860 at Market Harborough, LeicestershireIGI

   75022.3 John Coemale
Birth: about 1862, at Market Harborough, LeicestershireCensus

   75032.4 Emma Coefemale
Birth: about 1864, at Market Harborough, LeicestershireCensus

   75042.5 Mary A Coefemale
Birth: about 1866, at Market Harborough, LeicestershireCensus



The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.

Source Codes

top of page