You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Sansome > Ann Sansome (1715 - 1775)

Desborough People
Ann Sansome


Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:


   7706 1.0 Ann Sansomefemale

Birth: about 1715MI
Death: 22 Oct 1775, age: 60yMI  memorial
Burial: 24 Oct 1775 at St Giles, Desborough (source reads 'Ann the wife of Lewis Cave')Bp Transcripts Desb

Married: Lewis Cave  at Clipston, Northamptonshire 09 Nov 1741IGI
b. 06 Jul 1710, at Desborough (source reads: Lewis the son of Will & Jane Cave Bapt)  d. 22 Apr 1783, age: 72y

   120822.1 William Cavemale
Parents as given in IGI (source Batch: 1860442)
Birth: 1746MI
Death: 08 Mar 1821, age: 75. MI  memorial
Burial: 13 Mar 1821, aged 75, at St Giles, DesboroughNBI

Additional Information: Newspaper Article

   124162.2 George Cavemale
Birth: 1749MI
Death: 03 May 1771, age: 22. MI  memorial
Burial: 05 May 1771 at St Giles, Desborough (source reads 'George Cave')Bp Transcripts Desb

   124172.3 Jane Cavefemale
Birth: 1763MI
Death: 16 May 1775, age: 12. MI  memorial
Burial: at St Giles, DesboroughMI



The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.

Source Codes

top of page