You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Chaney > Emily Chaney (1865 - )

Desborough People
Emily Chaney

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   7815 1.0 Emily Chaney   also known as Emma Chaneyfemale

Birth: about 1865, at Billington, BedfordshireCensus

Pedigree
   5135
Married: James Marlow  1885BMD
b. about 1864, at DesboroughCensus

   78162.1 Mary A Marlowfemale
Birth: about 1886, at Stoke Mandeville, BuckinghamshireCensus

   78172.2 Joseph S Marlowmale
Birth: about 1887, at Roade, NorthamptonshireCensus

   78182.3 Ellen Marlowfemale
Birth: about May 1890, at Battersea, LondonCensus

   144042.4 Frederick Seaton Marlowmale
Baptism: 28 Oct 1896 at Battersea, LondonParish Reg

Additional information:

   144052.5 Edith Elizabeth Marlowfemale
Birth: 04 Dec 1897, at Battersea, LondonParish Reg
Baptism: 12 Jan 1898 at Battersea, LondonParish Reg

Additional information:

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page