You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Lad > Robert Lad (1617 - )

Desborough People
Robert Lad


Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:


   8150 1.0 Robert Ladmale

Birth: before 1617Est. from child

Married: Alice Alderman  at Faxton, Northamptonshire 11 Oct 1634IGI
b. 16 Jan 1610/11, at Desborough (source reads: Alice d Mark Alderman)

   83022.1 Francis Laddmale
Baptism: 09 Aug 1635 at Desborough (source reads 'Francis s Robt & Alice Ladd')Parish Reg
Burial: 21 Mar 1651/52 at St Giles, Desborough (source reads 'Francis Lad the Sonne of Robert Lad')Parish Reg

   158092.2 Elizabeth Laddfemale
Baptism: 17 May 1640 at Desborough (source reads 'Eliz d Robt & Alice Ladd')Parish Reg

   81522.3 John Ladmale
Baptism: 25 Feb 1648/49 at DesboroughParish Reg
Burial: 15 Oct 1649, aged c. 8m, at St Giles, Desborough (source reads 'John Lad the Sonne of Robt Lad')Parish Reg

   82282.4 John Ladmale
Baptism: 21 Nov 1651 at DesboroughParish Reg



The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.

Source Codes

top of page