You are here: Desborough > Surnames > [not known] > Elizabeth [not known] (1632 - )

Desborough People
Elizabeth [not known]

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   8174 1.0 Elizabeth [not known]female

Birth: before 1632, at Great Billing, NorthamptonshireEst. from child

Pedigree
   8173
Married: Peeter Seamaster  at Desborough after Banns, 02 Mar 1648 (marriage source reads: Peeter Seamaster of Desborow & Elizbeth       of Great Billing was married p bana 2 March 1649) Parish Reg
b. before 1632Est. from child

   81752.1 Bridget Seamasterfemale
Baptism: 17 Feb 1649 /50 at DesboroughParish Reg

   82152.2 Anne Seamasterfemale
Baptism: 22 Jun 1651 at DesboroughParish Reg
Burial: 04 Sep 1652, aged c. 1y 3m, at St Giles, Desborough (source reads 'Anne Seamaster the daughter of Peeter Seamaster') Parish Reg

   82722.3 John Seamastermale
Baptism: 30 Jan 1652 /53 at DesboroughParish Reg

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page