You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Groococke > Elizabeth Groococke (1626 - 1707)

Desborough People
Elizabeth Groococke


Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:


   8213 1.0 Elizabeth Groocockefemale
14484 Father: Giles Groococke   b. 28 Nov 1578 at Desborough

Baptism: 09 Nov 1626 at Desborough (source reads 'Eliz d Giles Groococke')Rec. Off. Trans.
Burial: 1707 at St Giles, Desborough (source reads 'Buryed 1707 Eliz. Loake Widow')Bp Transcripts Desb

Married: John Loake  04 Feb 1649 (marriage source reads: John Loake said to bee married to Elizabeth Groococke the 4th of February 1649. But where & by whom not professed to mee)Parish Reg
b. before 1633, at Desborough

   82142.1 John Loakemale
Baptism: 01 Jun 1651 at DesboroughParish Reg

   174192.2 Mary Loakefemale
Baptism: 21 Jun 1662 at Rushton, Northamptonshire (source reads 'Mary, d. of John Loake of Desborough and Elizabeth his w.')Parish Reg



The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.

Source Codes

top of page