You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Tailby > James Tailby (1850 - 1883)

Desborough People
James Tailby

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   867 1.0 James Tailbymale
859 Father: George Tailby    b. 1814 at Braybrooke, Northamptonshire    d. 28 Oct 1900 at Desborough
860 Mother: Ann Deacon    b. about 1815 at Desborough    d. 20 Jun 1855
Birth: About Mar 1850, at DesboroughIGI
Baptism: 15 Sep 1856 at DesboroughIGI
Death: 1883, age: 33yBMD

Pedigree
   2733
Married: Elizabeth Asher  at Desborough 03 May 1875IGI
b. about 1851, at DesboroughCensus

   43332.1 Elizabeth Ann Tailby   also known as Annie E Tailbyfemale
Birth: about 1876, at DesboroughCensus

   43342.2 John Tailbymale
Birth: about 1877, at Loddington, NorthamptonshireCensus

   43352.3 Frederick Tailbymale
Birth: about 1879, at Loddington, NorthamptonshireCensus

   43362.4 Frank Tailbymale
Birth: about 1881, at Loddington, NorthamptonshireCensus

   142792.5 Ethel Tailbyfemale
Birth: about 1883, at Loddington, NorthamptonshireCensus

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page