You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Taylor > Linda Maud Taylor (1866 - )

Desborough People
Linda Maud Taylor

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   8802 1.0 Linda Maud Taylorfemale
16527 Father: Joseph Taylor    b. 1826 at Sherborne, Gloucester
16528 Mother: Bessie [not known]    b. 1834 at Cheverell, Wiltshire
Birth: about 1866, at Melksham, WiltshireCensus

Pedigree
   8801
Married: Daniel Tucker  1887BMD
b. about 1857, at Melksham, WiltshireCensus

   88032.1 Daniel Tuckermale
Birth: about 1889, at Ford Colerne, WiltshireCensus

   88042.2 Elizabeth Tuckerfemale
Birth: about 1890, at Derry Hill, Calne, WiltshireCensus

   88052.3 Elkelinda Tuckerfemale
Birth: about 1892, at Derry Hill, Calne, WiltshireCensus

   88062.4 Richard Tuckermale
Birth: about 1894, at Derry Hill, Calne, WiltshireCensus

   88072.5 William Tuckermale
Birth: about 1896, at DesboroughCensus

   88082.6 Winifred Tuckerfemale
Birth: about 1898, at DesboroughCensus

   88092.7 John Tuckermale
Birth: about Jun 1900, at DesboroughCensus

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page