Desborough People
Elizabeth [not known]
Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:
9085
1.0 Elizabeth [not known]female
Surname may be Spencer or Ward
Birth: about 1838, at Earls Barton, Northamptonshire
CensusPedigree
9084Married:
William Coles
1861
BMD
b. about 1838, at Walgrave, NorthamptonshireCensus
Birth: about 1862, at Earls Barton, NorthamptonshireCensus
Birth: about 1864, at Walgrave, NorthamptonshireCensus
Birth: about 1866, at Walgrave, NorthamptonshireCensus
Birth: about 1868, at Walgrave, NorthamptonshireCensus
Birth: about 1868, at Walgrave, NorthamptonshireCensus
Birth: about Mar 1871, at Walgrave, Northamptonshire
Census1934Married:
Joseph Martin
at Desborough 01 Aug 1892
IGI
b. Nov 1860, at DesboroughCensus
Birth: about 1894, at DesboroughCensus
Birth: about 1896, at DesboroughCensus
Birth: about 1898, at DesboroughCensus
Birth: about Jul 1900, at DesboroughCensus
Birth: about 1874, at Walgrave, NorthamptonshireCensus
Birth: about 1876, at Walgrave, NorthamptonshireCensus
Birth: about 1879, at Walgrave, NorthamptonshireCensus
Notes
The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.
The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown
when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.
Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier;
if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.
Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.
Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51"
show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650),
and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating"
are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.
Source Codes
top of page