You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Wilford > Richard Wilford (1821 - )

Desborough People
Richard Wilford


Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:


   9655 1.0 Richard Wilfordmale

Birth: about 1821, at Naseby, NorthamptonshireCensus

Married: Jane [not known] 
b. about 1830, at North Kilworth, LeicestershireCensus
Birth: about 1862, at Naseby, NorthamptonshireCensus

Additional information:

Mother of the following, apparently unmarried, child's father unknown

   96573.1 Edith Wilfordfemale
Birth: about 1885, at Naseby, NorthamptonshireCensus

Additional information:

Married: Enoch Baxter  1893BMD
b. about 1879, at Braybrooke, NorthamptonshireCensus

   96583.1 Elizabeth Baxterfemale
Birth: about 1895, at DesboroughCensus

   96593.2 Mabel Baxterfemale
Birth: about 1897, at DesboroughCensus

   96603.3 Clare Baxterfemale
Birth: about 1899, at DesboroughCensus

   96613.4 Ada Baxterfemale
Birth: about Sep 1900, at DesboroughCensus



The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.

Source Codes

top of page