You are here: Desborough > Surnames > [not known] > Margaret [not known] (1843 - )

Desborough People
Margaret [not known]


Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:


   9823 1.0 Margaret [not known]female

Birth: about 1843, at Elgin, MorayCensus

Married: Samuel Riley  before 1871Est. from child
b. about 1839Census

   98242.1 Emily Rileyfemale
Birth: about 1871, at Kussowlie, BengalCensus

   98252.2 Elizabeth A Rileyfemale
Birth: about 1873, at Kussowlie, BengalCensus

   98262.3 Margaret L Rileyfemale
Birth: about 1875, at Netley, HampshireCensus

   98272.4 Florence G Rileyfemale
Birth: about 1876, at Canterbury, KentCensus

   98282.5 Esther Rose Rileyfemale
Birth: about 1878, at Ewehurst, SussexCensus
Death: 15 Dec 1938 , at Kettering General Hospital, Kettering, Northamptonshire, age: 60y
Probate: 07 Mar 1939  executors, etc

Additional Information: BMD Announcements
Married: John Harris Humfrey  at Desborough 30 Aug 1902Mercury
b. about 1874, at DesboroughCensus

   98292.6 Cecil U Rileymale
Birth: about Jun 1880, at Grantham, LincolnshireCensus



The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.

Source Codes

top of page