You are here: Family History > Surname > Humphrey > Ellen Humphrey (1853 - )

Ellen Humphrey

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   1506 1.0 Ellen Humphreyfemale
2528 Father: James Humphrey (born 1820 at Horne, Surrey ) IGI
2529 Mother: Mary [not known]
Birth: 1853, at Horne, SurreyCensus

Pedigree

Census Details: 1911
   1497
Married: William Razzell  1875BMD
b. about 1855, at Charlwood, Surrey

Census Details: 1861 1911

   15072.1 Caleb William Razzellmale
Birth: 1875, at Croydon, SurreyCensus
Death: 30 Apr 1919CWGC
2194
Married: Alice Mary Keen 

   15082.2 James Razzellmale
Birth: about 1879, at Croydon, SurreyCensus

   15092.3 Edward J Razzellmale
Birth: about 1882, at Croydon, SurreyCensus

   15102.4 Alfred Razzellmale
Birth: about 1886, at Croydon, SurreyCensus
Death: 31 Mar 1916, at FranceCWGC

   15112.5 Charles Henry Razzellmale
Birth: about 1890, at Croydon, SurreyBMD

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears like, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page