You are here: Family History > Surname > French > William French (1832 - )

William French

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   2210 1.0 William Frenchmale
2215 Father: Nathaniel French (born about 1805 at Alkerton, Oxfordshire ) Census
2216 Mother: Sarah [not known] (born about 1801 at Aston, Warwickshire ) Census
Birth: about 1832, at Alkerton, OxfordshireCensus

Pedigree

Census Details: 1841 1851 1861
   2185
Married: Hannah Cross  about 1867BMD
b. about 1835, at Great Rollright, Oxfordshire

Census Details: 1841

   22112.1 Montague Frenchmale
Birth: about 1868, at Great Rollright, OxfordshireCensus

   22142.2 William Frenchmale
Birth: about 1870, at Great Rollright, OxfordshireCensus
Death: before 1873Census

   22122.3 William Frenchmale
Birth: about 1873, at Great Rollright, OxfordshireCensus

   22132.4 Herbert Frenchmale
Birth: about 1875, at Great Rollright, OxfordshireCensus

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears like, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page