You are here: Family History > Surname > Ellis > Melvyn Frederick Ellis (1900 - 1957)

Melvyn Frederick Ellis


Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:


   957 1.0 Melvyn Frederick Ellis   also known as Frederick Ellismale
294 Father: Frederick Henry Ellis (born 16 Jan 1875 at Southwark, London ) Emp Records
1149 Mother: Jane Charlotte Kelley (born 1875 at Paddington, London ) Census
Birth: 1900, at Paddington, LondonBMD
Death: 27 Dec 1957, at Hammersmith, LondonProbate
Probate: 26 Mar 1958  executors, etc


Additional information: Baptism  Marriage 

Census Details: 1901 1911 1939
Married: Ada Violet Jenn  at Parish Church, Friern Barnet, Hornsey, London 03 Sep 1927Mrg Cert
b. 16 Mar 1902  d. 1976, at Enfield, Middlesex

Census Details: 1939

   44442.1 Eileen Dorinda Ellisfemale
Birth: 23 Dec 1930Census
Death: 14 Jul 1990Probate
Probate: 21 Aug 1990  executors, etc

Census Details: 1939
Married: Raymond A Martin  1959BMD



The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears like, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.

Source Codes

top of page