You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Feakin > Samuel Feakin (1841 - )

Desborough People
Samuel Feakin

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   1002 1.0 Samuel Feakinmale
997 Father: Daniel Feakin    b. about 1791
998 Mother: Mary Burditt    b. about 1805 at Ashby Magna, Leicestershire    d. 1885
Birth: 1841, at DesboroughCensus
Baptism: 21 Mar 1841 at DesboroughIGI

Pedigree
   7568
Married: (1) Sarah Ann Bosworth  1865BMD
b. about 1841, at Cold Ashby, NorthamptonshireCensus

   75692.1 William James Feakin   also known as James Feakinmale
Birth: about 1868, at Market Harborough, LeicestershireCensus

   75702.2 Emily Ann Feakinfemale
Birth: about 1870, at Market Harborough, LeicestershireCensus

   99472.3 William B Feakinmale
Birth: about 1873, at Market Harborough, LeicestershireCensus

   99482.4 Mary Nellie Feakin   also known as Nelly Feakinfemale
Birth: about 1878, at Market Harborough, LeicestershireCensus

   14368
Married: (2) Charlotte Cockerill  about 1891BMD
b. about 1855, at Lubenham, LeicestershireCensus

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page