You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Ginns > Thomas Ginns (1653 - 1718)

Desborough People
Thomas Ginns

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   10147 1.0 Thomas Ginnsmale

Birth: before 1653Est. from child
Burial: 31 Jan 1717 /18 at St Giles, Desborough (source reads 'Thomas Ginns') Bp Transcripts Desb

Pedigree

   103532.1 [male] Ginnsmale
Parish register shows: 'a son born but not baptised' between Jan 22 and Feb 26 1670/71. Mother not shown.
Birth: Feb 1670 /71, at DesboroughParish Reg


   106062.2 [male] Ginnsmale
Birth appears between entries for 1st Jul and 3rd Sep 1672
Birth: --- 1672, at Desborough (source reads: A Son of Tho: Ginns born) Parish Reg


   103522.3 [male] Ginnsmale
Appears in parish register between Jan 20 and Feb 17 1677/78
Birth: Feb 1677 /78, at Desborough (source reads: A Son of Tho: Ginns still born) Parish Reg
Death: Feb 1677 /78, Stillborn , at DesboroughParish Reg


   103882.4 [male] Ginnsmale
Birth: Oct 1679, at Desborough (source reads: A Child of Tho: Ginns born) Parish Reg

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page