You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Yeomans > Montague Pell Yeomans (1857 - )

Desborough People
Montague Pell Yeomans

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   1104 1.0 Montague Pell Yeomansmale
Montague's mother was a Coe, daughter of John (b about 1797) and his wife's mother was a Coe, daughter of Nathaniel (b about 1803), so it's possible that their grandfathers were brothers. Montague appears to have been listed twice in 1871: once with grandfather Samuel Yeomans and once with father Joseph Yeomans.
1098 Father: Joseph Yeomans    bap. 13 Oct 1833 at Desborough    d. 12 May 1920
106 Mother: Lydia Coe    b. 11 Mar 1832 at Desborough    d. 06 Feb 1914
Birth: about 1857, at DesboroughCensus

Pedigree
   2065
Married: Ann Elizabeth Wilford  1882BMD
b. about 1859, at DesboroughCensus

   53542.1 Lydia Ann Yeomansfemale
Birth: about 1884, at DesboroughCensus

   53552.2 Montague Wilford Yeomansmale
Birth: about 1888, at DesboroughCensus

   53562.3 Winifred Ethel Yeomansfemale
Birth: about 1890, at DesboroughCensus

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page