You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Liner > Louisa Liner (1867 - )

Desborough People
Louisa Liner

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   1122 1.0 Louisa Linerfemale
1117 Father: Charles Liner    b. 1831 at Rothwell, Northamptonshire    d. 08 Mar 1892
1118 Mother: Ann Slow    b. 1830 at Northampton, Northamptonshire    d. 20 Jul 1930
Birth: about 1867, at DesboroughCensus

Pedigree
   16885
Married: William Henry Anson  1894BMD
b. about 1866, at Wednesbury, StaffordshireCensus

   168862.1 Muriel Louisa Ansonfemale
Birth: about 1896, at Churchill, OxfordshireCensus
Baptism: 05 Apr 1896IGI

   168872.2 Andrew William Ansonmale
Birth: about 1898, at Churchill, OxfordshireCensus

   168882.3 Mary Ansonfemale
Birth: about 1900, at Churchill, OxfordshireCensus

   168892.4 James Bernard Ansonmale
Birth: about 1904, at Churchill, OxfordshireCensus

   168902.5 Edith Ansonfemale
Birth: about 1906, at Churchill, OxfordshireCensus

   168912.6 Fred Charles Edmund Ansonmale
Birth: about 1909, at Churchill, OxfordshireCensus

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page