You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Burditt > Sarah Burditt (1762 - )

Desborough People
Sarah Burditt


Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:


   13012 1.0 Sarah Burdittfemale

Birth: before 1762Est. from marriage

Married: John Tailby  at Desborough by Licence, 30 Mar 1780 (marriage source reads: John Tailby & Sarah Burditt By Licence)Bp Transcripts Desb
b. before 1752

   130232.6 Robert Edwards Tailbymale
Baptism: 18 Sep 1780 at Desborough (source reads 'Robt Edwards, son of Jno and Sarah Tailby')Bp Transcripts Desb

   131702.9 George Tailbymale
Baptism: 24 Sep 1786 at Desborough (source reads 'George, son of John and Sarah Tailby')Bp Transcripts Desb

   132232.10 Thomas Tailbymale
Baptism: 04 Jun 1788 at Desborough (source reads 'Thomas, son of John and Sarah Tailby')Bp Transcripts Desb

   133032.11 Ann Tailbyfemale
Baptism: 10 Oct 1790 at Desborough (source reads 'Ann Dr of John & Sarah Tailby')Bp Transcripts Desb



The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.

Source Codes

top of page