You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Bayley > Edward Bayley (1610 - )

Desborough People
Edward Bayley


Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:


   14085 1.0 Edward Bayleymale
8375 Father: Thomas Baily    b. before 1585 at Maidwell, Northamptonshire    bur. 29 May 1633 at St Giles, Desborough
8376 Mother: Jane Alderman    b. before 1585
Baptism: 09 Aug 1610 at Desborough (source reads 'Edward s Thos Bailye') Rec. Off. Trans.

Married: Bridget Martin  at Desborough after Banns, 26 Jun 1638 (marriage source reads: Edward Bayley & Bridget Martin both of this parish) Rec. Off. Trans.
b. before 1620, at DesboroughEst. from marriage

   158042.1 Thomas Baylymale
Baptism: 17 Jul 1639 at Desborough (source reads 'Thos s Edward & Bridget Bayly') Rec. Off. Trans.

   158422.2 Richard Balymale
Baptism: 29 Jan 1641 /42 at Desborough (source reads 'Richard s Edward & Bridget Baly') Rec. Off. Trans.



The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.

Source Codes

top of page