You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Alderman > Jane Alderman (1585 - )

Desborough People
Jane Alderman

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   8376 1.0 Jane Aldermanfemale

Birth: before 1585Est. from marriage

Pedigree
   8375
Married: Thomas Baily  at Desborough 17 Nov 1603 (marriage source reads: Thos Baily of Maidwell & Jane Alderman)Rec. Off. Trans.
b. before 1585, at Maidwell, Northamptonshire  bur. 29 May 1633, at St Giles, Desborough (source reads: Thos Bayly - an old man)

Baptism: 09 Aug 1610 at Desborough (source reads 'Edward s Thos Bailye')Rec. Off. Trans.
14086
Married: Bridget Martin  at Desborough after Banns, 26 Jun 1638 (marriage source reads: Edward Bayley & Bridget Martin both of this parish)Rec. Off. Trans.
b. before 1620, at Desborough

   158043.1 Thomas Baylymale
Baptism: 17 Jul 1639 at Desborough (source reads 'Thos s Edward & Bridget Bayly')Rec. Off. Trans.

   158423.2 Richard Balymale
Baptism: 29 Jan 1641/42 at Desborough (source reads 'Richard s Edward & Bridget Baly')Rec. Off. Trans.

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page