You are here: Desborough > Surnames > [not known] > Alice [not known] (1595 - 1640)

Desborough People
Alice [not known]

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   14192 1.0 Alice [not known]female
Widow at the date of her second marriage and no trace yet of the first marriage, so no real clue to her date of birth

Birth: before 1595, at DesboroughEst. from marriage
Burial: 07 Apr 1640 at St Giles, Desborough (source reads 'Tues in Easter Week. Alice Saye, a poor widow kept of the town') Rec. Off. Trans.

Pedigree
   14191
Married: (1) [male] Rippin 

   14193
Married: (2) Saunders Saye  at Desborough 19 Oct 1613 (marriage source reads: Saunders Saye & Alice Rippin, widow both of this parish) Rec. Off. Trans.
b. before 1595, at DesboroughEst. from marriage

   155272.1 Saye Saygemale
Burial: 15 Sep 1614 at St Giles, Desborough (source reads 'Saye s Saunders Sayge') Rec. Off. Trans.

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page