You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Saye > Saunders Saye ( - 1640)

Desborough People
Saunders Saye

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   14193 1.0 Saunders Sayemale

Birth: before 1595, at DesboroughEst. from marriage
Death: before 1640Derived/Parish Reg

Pedigree

   153612.1 George Saygemale
Baptism: 22 Sep 1611 at Desborough (source reads 'George s Saunders Sayge - by the report of that child's mother, base begotten')Rec. Off. Trans.

   14192
Married: Alice Rippin nee [not known]  at Desborough 19 Oct 1613 (marriage source reads: Saunders Saye & Alice Rippin, widow both of this parish)Rec. Off. Trans.
b. before 1595, at Desborough  bur. 07 Apr 1640, at St Giles, Desborough (source reads: Tues in Easter Week. Alice Saye, a poor widow kept of the town)

   155272.1 Saye Saygemale
Burial: 15 Sep 1614 at St Giles, Desborough (source reads 'Saye s Saunders Sayge')Rec. Off. Trans.

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page