You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Sayge > Ralph Sayge (1588 - )

Desborough People
Ralph Sayge

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   14595 1.0 Ralph Saygemale
14561 Father: John Sayge   b. before 1566

Baptism: 01 Nov 1588 at Desborough (source reads 'Ralph s John Sayge')Rec. Off. Trans.

Pedigree

   154982.1 John Saygemale
Burial: 26 Jun 1610 at St Giles, Desborough (source reads 'John s Ralph Sayge')Rec. Off. Trans.


   153522.2 Ralph Saygemale
Baptism: 20 Dec 1610 at Desborough (source reads 'John s Ralph Sayge')Rec. Off. Trans.


   153732.3 Stephen Saygemale
Baptism: 25 Jul 1612 at Desborough (source reads 'Stephen s Ralph Sayge')Rec. Off. Trans.


   154222.4 Saunders Sayemale
Baptism: 06 Aug 1618 at Desborough (source reads 'Saunders s Ralph Saye')Rec. Off. Trans.


   155342.5 Eliz Sagefemale
Baptism: 18 Oct 1622 at Desborough (source reads 'Eliz d Ralph Sage')Rec. Off. Trans.

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page