You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Winsall > Amelia Winsall (1868 - )

Desborough People
Amelia Winsall

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   1628 1.0 Amelia Winsallfemale
1624 Father: John Winsall    bap. 29 Dec 1833 at Desborough    d. about 1884
1625 Mother: Lois Ralph    b. about 1836 at Desborough
Birth: about 1868, at DesboroughCensus

Pedigree
   3164
Married: Titus Coe  1889BMD
b. about 1864, at DesboroughCensus

   44082.1 Luther Coemale
Birth: about 1890, at DesboroughCensus

   44092.2 Wilfrid Coemale
Birth: about Sep 1890, at DesboroughCensus

   85442.3 Oliver Coemale
Enlisted Sep 1914, but discharged Nov 1914 because he was subject to epileptic fits
Birth: about 1892, at DesboroughCensus

Additional information: Army Service

   85452.4 Florrie Coefemale
Birth: about 1894, at DesboroughCensus

   85462.5 Clifford Coemale
Birth: about 1899, at DesboroughCensus

   85472.6 Evelyn Coefemale
Birth: about 1900, at DesboroughCensus

   173992.7 Gethin Coemale
Birth: about 1903, at DesboroughCensus

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page