You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Palmer > Hannah Palmer (1841 - 1869)

Desborough People
Hannah Palmer

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   16569 1.0 Hannah Palmerfemale
Father: Jesse Palmer   b. about 1809 at Clipston, Northamptonshire
Mother: Lucy [n.k.]   b. about 1804 at Clipston, Northamptonshire
Birth: about 1841, at Clipston, NorthamptonshireCensus
Death: 1869, age: 29yBMD

Pedigree

Additional information: Marriage Certificate 1860 

Census Details: not at Desborough in 1861
   7460
Married: James Buswell  at Parish Church, Lambeth, London 22 Jul 1860Parish Reg
b. about 1838, at Clipston, Northamptonshire

   74622.1 Mary Ellen Buswellfemale
Birth: 1867, at Clipston, NorthamptonshireBMD
Baptism: 12 May 1867 at Clipston, NorthamptonshireIGI

   74632.2 Kate Buswellfemale
Birth: 1869, at Clipston, NorthamptonshireBMD
Baptism: 08 May 1870 at Clipston, NorthamptonshireIGI

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page