You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Buswell > James Buswell (1838 - )

Desborough People
James Buswell

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   7460 1.0 James Buswellmale
Father: Charles Buswell
Mother: Mary [n.k.]
Birth: about 1838, at Clipston, NorthamptonshireCensus

Pedigree
   16569
Married: (1) Hannah Palmer  at Parish Church, Lambeth, London 22 Jul 1860Parish Reg
b. about 1841, at Clipston, NorthamptonshireCensus

   74622.1 Mary Ellen Buswellfemale
Birth: 1867, at Clipston, NorthamptonshireBMD
Baptism: 12 May 1867 at Clipston, NorthamptonshireIGI

   74632.2 Kate Buswellfemale
Birth: 1869, at Clipston, NorthamptonshireBMD
Baptism: 08 May 1870 at Clipston, NorthamptonshireIGI

   1670
Married: (2) Ann Asher  at Parish Church, Putney, London 18 Apr 1870Parish Reg
b. about 1831, at DesboroughCensus

   16570
Married: (3) Eliza Grace Jays  1886BMD
b. about 1841, at Aylestone, LeicestershireCensus

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page