Desborough People
Thomas Mumford
Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:
16646
1.0 Thomas Mumfordmale
Birth: about 1800, at Kings Walden, Hertfordshire
CensusPedigree
16648Married:
(1)
Jane Angel
at Kings Walden, Hertfordshire 17 Jan 1829
IGI
b. about 1809, at Kings Walden, HertfordshireCensus
Not all children of the above parents are listed below. Click on Census Details links of father and/or mother for more
Birth: about 1830, at Bendish, Hertfordshire
CensusMother of the following,
apparently unmarried,
child's father unknown
Birth: about Feb 1851, at Bendish, Hertfordshire
Census
Birth: about 1879, at Desborough
Census
Birth: about 1909, at Desborough
Census
Death: 09 Mar 1965, age: 56y
MI
memorial
Burial: at Desborough Cemetery, Desborough
MI
Birth: about 1880, at DesboroughCensus
Birth: about 1888, at DesboroughCensus
Birth: about 1890, at DesboroughCensus
Death: 17 Aug 1916, Killed in actionDied Great War
Notes
The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.
The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown
when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.
Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier;
if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.
Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.
Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51"
show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650),
and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating"
are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.
Source Codes
top of page