You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Yeomans > Emma Yeomans (1853 - )

Desborough People
Emma Yeomans

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   1699 1.0 Emma Yeomansfemale
1695 Father: Richard Yeomans   b. 10 Sep 1809 at Desborough
1696 Mother: Martha Turner   b. about 1819 at Desborough
Birth: about 1853, at DesboroughCensus

Pedigree
   2675
Married: William Cleaver  1873BMD
b. about 1851, at Foxton, Leicestershire

   26762.1 Annie Cleaverfemale
Birth: about 1875, at DesboroughCensus

   26772.2 Matilda Cleaverfemale
Birth: about 1879, at DesboroughCensus

   26782.3 George Cleavermale
Birth: about Dec 1880, at DesboroughCensus

   93732.4 Katy Cleaverfemale
Birth: about 1883, at Pytchley, NorthamptonshireCensus

   93742.5 Frederick Cleavermale
Birth: about 1886, at Pytchley, NorthamptonshireCensus

   93752.6 Richard Cleavermale
Birth: about Sep 1890, at Wellingborough, NorthamptonshireCensus

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page