You are here: Desborough > Surnames > [not known] > Mary Ann [not known] (1817 - )

Desborough People
Mary Ann [not known]

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   17602 1.0 Mary Ann [not known]female

Birth: about 1817, at Tur Langton, LeicestershireCensus

Pedigree
   17601
Married: Thomas Berridge 
b. about 1813, at Stoke Albany, NorthamptonshireCensus

   176032.1 Mary A Berridgefemale
Birth: about 1851, at Stoke Albany, NorthamptonshireCensus

   176002.2 Hannah Berridgefemale
Hannah and her sister Catherine married brothers
Birth: about 1854, at Stoke Albany, NorthamptonshireCensus
7729
Married: Amos Tansley Houghton  1881BMD
b. about 1853, at Wilbarston, NorthamptonshireIGI

   91092.3 Catherine Berridgefemale
Catherine and her sister Hannah married brothers
Birth: about 1856, at Stoke Albany, NorthamptonshireCensus
7731
Married: Edmund Harold Houghton  1894BMD
b. March 1861, at Wilbarston, NorthamptonshireIGI

   176042.4 Rebecca Berridgefemale
Birth: about 1860, at Stoke Albany, NorthamptonshireCensus

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page