You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Coe > Arthur Coe (1869 - 1932)

Desborough People
Arthur Coe

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   2492 1.0 Arthur Coemale
961 Father: Joseph Coe   b. 18 Mar 1840 at Desborough   d. 26 Nov 1891 at Desborough
2490 Mother: Eliza Reculist   b. 12 Jul 1841 at Desborough
Birth: about 1869, at DesboroughCensus
Death: 1932, age: 63yBMD

Pedigree
   2462
Married: Emily Stevenson  about 1889BMD
b. about 1870, at Desborough  d. 15 Sep 1939, age: 70y

   55542.1 Maurice Coemale
Birth: about 1890, at DesboroughCensus

   95852.2 Ethel Coefemale
Birth: about 1892, at DesboroughCensus
Baptism: 25 Dec 1892 at DesboroughIGI

   95862.3 Arthur Coemale
Birth: about 1895, at DesboroughCensus
Baptism: 02 Jun 1895 at DesboroughIGI

   95872.4 Beatrice A Coefemale
Birth: about 1898, at DesboroughCensus

   95882.5 John Coemale
Birth: about 1900, at DesboroughCensus

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page