You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Wallis > Sarah Ann Wallis (1874 - )

Desborough People
Sarah Ann Wallis

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   2741 1.0 Sarah Ann Wallisfemale
403 Father: William Wallace   b. 30 Nov 1834 at Desborough
1918 Mother: Mary Ann Reculist   b. 20 Apr 1836 at Desborough
Birth: 1874, at DesboroughCensus

Pedigree
   4605
Married: William King  about 1898BMD
b. about 1873, at Newton Harcourt, Leicestershire

   94382.1 Emma Elizabeth Kingfemale
Birth: about 1899, at DesboroughCensus
Baptism: 19 Jul 1905 at DesboroughIGI

   94392.2 James William Kingmale
Birth: about 1900, at DesboroughCensus
Baptism: 19 Jul 1905 at DesboroughIGI

   171262.3 Ernest Arnold Kingmale
Birth: about 1903, at DesboroughCensus
Baptism: 19 Jul 1905 at DesboroughIGI

   171272.4 Alfred Joseph Kingmale
Birth: about 1905, at DesboroughCensus
Baptism: 19 Jul 1905 at DesboroughIGI

   171282.5 Florrie Kingfemale
Birth: about 1908, at DesboroughCensus

   171292.6 Fred Kingmale
Birth: about 1910, at DesboroughCensus

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page