You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Marlow > Kate Marlow (1876 - )

Desborough People
Kate Marlow

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   2876 1.0 Kate Marlowfemale
1703 Father: Frederick Marlow   b. about 1854 at Desborough   d. 1887
2834 Mother: Clara Marlow   b. about 1854 at Desborough
Birth: about 1876, at DesboroughCensus

Pedigree
   2931
Married: Frederick Joseph Coe  1892BMD
b. about 1869, at Desborough

   169532.1 Frederick Archer Coemale
Baptism: 02 Jul 1893 at DesboroughIGI
Death: about 1894, age: 0. BMD

   86062.2 May Coefemale
Birth: about 1895, at DesboroughCensus
Baptism: 26 May 1895 at DesboroughIGI

   86072.3 Gladys Coefemale
Birth: about 1897, at DesboroughCensus
Baptism: 28 Nov 1897 at DesboroughIGI

   86082.4 Leonard Coemale
Birth: about Aug 1900, at DesboroughCensus
Baptism: 03 Apr 1904 at DesboroughIGI

   169582.5 Doris Coefemale
Baptism: 03 Apr 1904 at DesboroughIGI

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page