You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Tailby > Emma Elizabeth Tailby (1878 - 1957)

Desborough People
Emma Elizabeth Tailby


Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:


   3173 1.0 Emma Elizabeth Tailbyfemale
866 Father: William Deacon Tailby   b. About Jun 1848 at Desborough   d. 1934
3167 Mother: Amelia Rose Mee   b. about 1847 at Cheltenham, Gloucestershire   d. 06 Jan 1913
Birth: 1878, at DesboroughBMD
Death: 19 Feb 1957, age: 78yDeceased Online
Cremation: 21 Feb 1957 at Kettering Crematorium, Kettering, Northamptonshire
Married: Alfred Iliffe  1899BMD
b. about 1880, at Clipston, Northamptonshire  d. 1939, age: 60y

   170842.1 Leonard Thomas Iliffemale
Birth: 1900, at DesboroughCensus
Baptism: 24 Jun 1900 at DesboroughIGI

   170852.2 Raymond Iliffemale
Birth: 1907, at DesboroughCensus
Death: Feb 1963, at 30 Harborough Rd, Desborough, age: 56y. Derived/Parish Reg
Burial: 11 Feb 1963 at DesboroughNhants PRs



The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.

Source Codes

top of page