You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Panter > Robert Panter (1868 - )

Desborough People
Robert Panter


Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:


   3352 1.0 Robert Pantermale
763 Father: James Panter    b. about 1826 at Desborough    d. 20 Jun 1903 at Desborough
764 Mother: Elizabeth [not known]    b. about 1828 at Middleton, Northamptonshire
Birth: 25 Mar 1868, at DesboroughBirth Cert

Married: Mary Maria Cheney  1888BMD
b. 11 Jul 1869, at Newborough, CambridgeshireBirth Cert

   84702.1 Walter Robert Pantermale
Birth: 19 Feb 1890, at DesboroughBirth Cert
Death: 15 May 1916, age: 26MI   memorial
Burial: at Pieta Cemetery, MaltaMI

   84712.2 Clifford Arthur Pantermale
Birth: about 1898, at DesboroughCensus

   116552.3 Harriett Elizabeth Panterfemale
Birth: about 1901, at DesboroughWW1 Army

Additional information: Wedding photograph
Married: John Robert March  1927BMD
b. about 1902, at Rothwell, NorthamptonshireCensus



The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.

Source Codes

top of page