Desborough People
Joseph Plowright
Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:
3570
1.0 Joseph Plowrightmale
Probate calendar gives date of death as 5th SEP 1929, whilst gravestone gives 5th APR 1929. Former is likely an error as Probate date is MAY 1929
Birth: about 1855, at Desborough
Census
Death: 05 Apr 1929
, at 20 Victoria Street, Desborough, age: 74
MI
memorial
Burial: at Desborough Cemetery, Desborough
MI
Probate: 22 May 1929
executors, etc
Pedigree
1479Married:
Anne Pridmore
1875
BMD
b. about 1857, at DesboroughCensus
Birth: about 1877, at Desborough
Census3513Married:
Arthur Tebbutt
about 1897
BMD
b. about 1876, at DesboroughCensus
Birth: about 1898, at DesboroughCensus
Birth: about 1880, at DesboroughCensus
Birth: about Mar 1881, at DesboroughCensus
Birth: about 1883, at Desborough
Census
Death: 04 Oct 1907, age: 24y
MI
memorial
Burial: at Desborough Cemetery, Desborough
MI
Birth: about 1886, at DesboroughCensus
Notes
The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.
The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown
when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.
Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier;
if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.
Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.
Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51"
show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650),
and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating"
are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.
Source Codes
top of page