You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Turner > Emma Turner (1845 - )

Desborough People
Emma Turner

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   3804 1.0 Emma Turnerfemale
Marriage cert shows father: Robert Turner, decd
497 Father: Robert Turner   b. about 1821   d. 1848
496 Mother: Sarah Turner   b. about 1821 at Desborough
Birth: about 1845, at DesboroughCensus

Pedigree
   9490
Married: Job Holyoak  1866BMD
b. about 1838, at

   94912.1 Emma Lydia Holyoakfemale
Birth: about 1867, at Leicester, LeicestershireCensus

   94922.2 William Henry Holyoakmale
Birth: about May 1870, at Newbold, LeicestershireCensus

   94932.3 Mary Ann Holyoakfemale
Birth: about 1872, at Newbold, LeicestershireCensus

   94942.4 Ellen Holyoakfemale
Birth: about 1874, at DesboroughCensus

   94952.5 Elizabeth Ann Holyoakfemale
Birth: about 1877, at DesboroughCensus

   94962.6 Sarah Holyoakfemale
Birth: about 1880, at DesboroughCensus

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page