Desborough People
Robert Turner
Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:
497
1.0 Robert Turnermale
Birth: about 1821
Census
Death: 1848, age: c. 27y
BMDPedigree
496Married:
Sarah Turner
1841
BMD
b. about 1821, at DesboroughCensus
Marriage cert shows father: Robert Turner, decd
Birth: about 1845, at Desborough
Census9490Married:
Job Holyoak
1866
BMD
b. about 1838, at Census
Birth: about 1867, at Leicester, LeicestershireCensus
Birth: about May 1870, at Newbold, LeicestershireCensus
Birth: about 1872, at Newbold, LeicestershireCensus
Birth: about 1874, at DesboroughCensus
Birth: about 1877, at DesboroughCensus
Birth: about 1880, at DesboroughCensus
Birth: about 1846, at n.k., NorthamptonshireCensus
Assumption that Elizabeth is Sarah's daughter. Elizabeth is William Turner's niece. William was the brother of either Sarah or Robert Turner and Sarah was living in Leicester about this time
Birth: about 1847, at Leicester, LeicestershireCensus
Notes
The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.
The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown
when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.
Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier;
if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.
Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.
Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51"
show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650),
and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating"
are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.
Source Codes
top of page