Desborough People
Amy Deacon
Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:
4065
1.0 Amy Deaconfemale
1275
Father:
Jonathan Deacon
b. 1785 at Desborough
d. 03 Aug 1865 at Desborough
1276
Mother:
Ann [not known]
b. 1786 at Market Harborough, Leicestershire
d. 14 Dec 1864
Birth: 1824
MI
Baptism: 04 Nov 1821 at Desborough
IGI
Death: 09 Oct 1861
, at Olney, Buckinghamshire, age: 37
MI
memorial
Burial: at St Giles, Desborough
MIPedigree
7264Married:
John Davison
before 1839
Est. from child
b. about 1819, at Lavendon, BuckinghamshireCensus
Birth: about 1845
Census
Baptism: 25 Dec 1847 at Olney, Buckinghamshire
IGI
Birth: about 1847
Census
Baptism: 25 Dec 1847 at Olney, Buckinghamshire
IGI
Birth: about 1852, at Olney, BuckinghamshireCensus
Birth: about 1855, at Olney, BuckinghamshireCensus
Birth: 1857, at Olney, Buckinghamshire
Census
Baptism: 12 Apr 1857 at Olney, Buckinghamshire
IGI
Baptism: 30 Jul 1860 at Olney, Buckinghamshire
IGI
Notes
The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.
The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown
when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.
Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier;
if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.
Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.
Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51"
show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650),
and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating"
are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.
Source Codes
top of page