You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Looms > Joseph Looms (1855 - )

Desborough People
Joseph Looms

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   5248 1.0 Joseph Loomsmale
5244 Father: George Looms   b. about 1825 at Wilbarston, Northamptonshire   d. 1907
5245 Mother: Lucy Sanders   b. about 1827 at Wilbarston, Northamptonshire   d. about 1859
Birth: about 1855, at Wilbarston, NorthamptonshireCensus

Pedigree
   469
Married: Emma Crick  1878BMD
b. about 1857, at Desborough

   52502.1 Edward Loomsmale
Birth: about Mar 1881, at DesboroughCensus

   58022.2 George Loomsmale
Birth: about 1881, at DesboroughCensus

   58032.3 Emma Loomsfemale
Birth: about 1889, at DesboroughCensus

   97872.4 Hannah Loomesfemale
Birth: about 1894, at DesboroughCensus

   97882.5 Thomas Loomesmale
Birth: about 1895, at DesboroughCensus

   97892.6 Joseph Loomesmale
Birth: about 1897, at DesboroughCensus

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page