You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Tailby > Adelaide Rebecca Tailby (1832 - )

Desborough People
Adelaide Rebecca Tailby

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   884 1.0 Adelaide Rebecca Tailbyfemale
873 Father: John Tailby   b. 1797   d. 24 Dec 1854
874 Mother: Rebecca Woodfield   b. 1799 at Napton, Warwickshire   d. 05 Aug 1877 at Desborough
Baptism: 22 Apr 1832 at DesboroughIGI
Death: 03 Jan 1912, at Great Oakley, Northamptonshire, age: 80yProbate
Probate: 24 Jan 1912  executors, etc

Pedigree
   16502
Married: John Moore  at London 02 Apr 1861Mrg Cert
b. about 1830

   165112.1 Jonathan Mooremale
Birth: about 1865, at Corby, NorthamptonshireCensus

   165122.2 Elizabeth Moorefemale
Birth: about 1867, at Corby, NorthamptonshireCensus

   165132.3 Emma Moorefemale
Birth: about 1868, at Corby, NorthamptonshireCensus

   165142.4 Mary Jane Moorefemale
Birth: about 1870, at Corby, NorthamptonshireCensus

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page